We had a "good-bye" lunch with our friends Ken and Voltaire this afternoon at their place. Voltaire started it off with a very nice martini for me just the way I like it - up with the vermouth bottle waved over the glass. Ken made a fabulous meal that was very healthy and took into consideration D's allergies to gluten and lactose. Sliced mango, pineapple, and persimmon for dessert. Coffee and candied coffee beans afterwards. My first persimmon ever. What can I say, I grew up in Texas.
Our post-prandial conversation wondered all over the place - racism in NO, homelessness in SF, the poor road conditions in NO, economic development in NO, Mardi Gras, what I planned to do after Tulane, etc. I made the observation that neither the homeless problem in SF nor the economic issues in NO would be solved in either city until someone showed some leadership. In SF, the city handles homelessness by outsourcing all of the 'services'. Throwing $200MM towards a problem and letting someone else get their hands dirty is easy, but no resolution will occur until the city takes ownership of the problem. NO isn't going to get real economic development going until the city, parish, and state stop trying to solve the problem by giving money to losing businesses to move there. Luring lousy businesses to a place with a lousy infrastructure doesn't yield true economic development. Fix the streets, fix the schools, fix the infrastructure, and businesses will start, grow, and flourish in NO.
D said I'm going to be a very frustrated person in NO if I thought anything was going to change there. Is that true? Is NO destined to continue to be a mediocre place that knows how to have fun? Is that OK? Should I expect better? Or should I simply order another sazerac and enjoy?
It was a good martini Voltaire made.
Our post-prandial conversation wondered all over the place - racism in NO, homelessness in SF, the poor road conditions in NO, economic development in NO, Mardi Gras, what I planned to do after Tulane, etc. I made the observation that neither the homeless problem in SF nor the economic issues in NO would be solved in either city until someone showed some leadership. In SF, the city handles homelessness by outsourcing all of the 'services'. Throwing $200MM towards a problem and letting someone else get their hands dirty is easy, but no resolution will occur until the city takes ownership of the problem. NO isn't going to get real economic development going until the city, parish, and state stop trying to solve the problem by giving money to losing businesses to move there. Luring lousy businesses to a place with a lousy infrastructure doesn't yield true economic development. Fix the streets, fix the schools, fix the infrastructure, and businesses will start, grow, and flourish in NO.
D said I'm going to be a very frustrated person in NO if I thought anything was going to change there. Is that true? Is NO destined to continue to be a mediocre place that knows how to have fun? Is that OK? Should I expect better? Or should I simply order another sazerac and enjoy?
It was a good martini Voltaire made.
